Register
|
There are key differences between manufacturing supply chains and aftermarket supply chains. Cohen et al. (2006) have summarised them (Table 1).
Manufacturing supply chain | After-sales services supply chain | |
Nature of demand | Predictable, can be forecast | Always unpredictable, sporadic |
Required response | Standardized, can be scheduled | ASAP (same day or next day) |
Number of SKUs | Limited | 15 to 20 times larger |
Product portfolio | Largely homogenous | Always heterogeneous |
Inventory management aim | Maximize velocity of resources | Pre-position resources |
Performance metric | Fill-rate | Product availability (uptime) |
Inventory turns | Six to 50 a year | One to four a year |
Table 1. Two supply chains compared. (Adapting Cohen et. al., 2006)
In practice, these come down to two main points:
Manufacturing supply chains are designed to provide good service levels while maximizing stock turnover. Conversely, spare parts are primarily there to act as insurance when a break-down occurs. In many breakdown situations time lost equals expense. Spares supply chain management is therefore all about stocking items which the end user hopes will never be needed but that when they are needed are required fast. Therefore, maximising inventory turnover is never the main goal in spare parts supply management. In fact, the average turnover in supply chains of companies with a strong reputation for spare parts management is as low as 0.87 (Cohen et. al., 1997).